top of page
Top
The_Old_Silk_Route,_East_Sikkim-1.jpg

THE CONTEXT

We began this unit by looking at how, from the very dawn of civilizations, goods and objects, ideas and biota flowed into, out of, and through the Indian subcontinent, crossing vast physical and cultural geographies, connecting it to different parts and peoples of the world. Specifically, we followed the movements of a range of things and non-human beings along three historically critical trading nodes and routes: (i) the Indus Valley trading network, which connected its urban centres with their counterparts in Mesopotamia, and through Mesopotamia to Egypt and the Mediterranean world; (ii) the Silk Road network that spanned the Asian continent, running through its middle, linked to ports along its southern rim, in which India was a geographically key site and played a culturally transformative role; (iii) and, the Indian Ocean network that began with the Indus-Mesopotamian trade movements and grew over thousands of years into a vast and expansive maritime economy with multiple, far-flung regional nodes--peninsular India being a central one. We saw how how deeply consequential, culturally and politically, these trade networks have been over the course of recorded history, and, from the perspective of the present, perhaps none more so than the appearance of western European nations in the Indian Ocean waters.

Goods, biota, and ideas, to state the obvious, do not move on their own; they move with people. And it is to the latter that we turn our attention to this week. A dizzying variety of people move along trade routes--including the ones noted above--in different capacities, serving different functions. Commercial and other trade-related socioeconomic classes/groups--from merchants to ship-hands--emerge in different societies through such motives and mobilities. While the histories of such communities and movement of individuals within these trade networks are absolutely fascinating to learn about, that is not our  focus this week, however. Instead, what will concern us here is a very specific kind of movement of people--migration. Specifically, this week, we will survey the long history of different ethnic groups, native to lands outside of the Indian subcontinent, who, over millennia, right down to the present, have come to the subcontinent and made India their home.

Over the course of this survey, we will encounter the proto-historical Steppe Pastoralists, or the 'Aryans' as we have come to call them; different ethnic groups from Central Asia, such as the Graeco-Bactrians, Yeuzhis, Turks, and Mongols; Jews from different parts of western Asia; Zoroastrians from Persia; Black Africans from the eastern parts of the continent, known in India as Siddis; Han Chinese people, Tibetan, Sri Lankan Tamil, and Rohingya refugees--the list runs long.  Indeed, some of these communities have become so mixed into the fabric of Indian society and culture that they have lost their distinct identities as migrants, while others wear their distinctiveness proudly through different means.

Sure enough, given the limited time we have, it is not possible to engage in any appreciable depth the unique histories of all the migrant communities mentioned above. Instead, armed with basic familiarity about different histories of migration into India, we will focus on only two--that of the Aryans and the Siddis.  The reason being that the former is a deeply controversial issue in contemporary India, and has been so for more than a century, whereas the latter is largely forgotten, leading to complete marginalization of the community in both racial and caste terms.

Context
Shah a'laan refugee camp Chris-Steele-Perkins-Magnum-Photos copy Long 2.jpg

This short video, Aryan Migration: Who are Our Ancestors?, looks at the new genetic research in to the question

This India 101 documentary takes a look at one of the last members of the centuries-old Jewish community in Cochin remaining in India

This documentary celebrates the Parsis of Bombay, who, from being Persian migrants in coastal Gujarat, became, almost a thousand years later, a hugely influential community with whom the city itself came to be identified

Again, a 101 India short that looks at both the plight and pride of the Siddi community ion Karnataka

PREPARING FOR THE WEEK

Preparing for this week is going to be fun! We will use visual material from the public domain--Youtube, mainly--for the survey part of our familiarization with flows of people into India. Whereas, the assigned readings will address the two histories of migration, separated by more than 3,000 years, we will look at more closely in class--that of the so-called Aryans and of the Siddis. Since the engagement this week is going to be more visual heavy, let us get an overview of the suggested viewings first.

VIEWINGS:
The bulk of these videos are short documentaries produced and hosted by one Youtube channel--'101 India'. It is a channel you should explore beyond the calling of this week. Its general focus is on the canvas of everyday life and culture in India, especially as lived and practiced by communities that are precariously placed in our society for different reasons. In this sphere of interest, it covers a wide array of observations and oddities. Migrant communities are an important subset of the channel's attention. 

The videos themselves are short, between from 5 to 10 minutes, slickly produced, and make for an interesting--often illuminating--watch. The ones we will use for our survey of migrant communities in India are linked in the sidebar columns. As you watch them, keep your eyes are ears 'open.' Pay attention to the visuals and the voice-over narration.
What do you think of the way the communities are shown/represented in the documentary? How do the people from each community featured in the videos talk about themselves? Do you notice any patterns? We will discuss our responses in class.


READINGS:
As noted above, the readings assigned for this week address only the Aryan question and the Siddi community, respectively. With regard to the former, you will read journalist and science writer, Tony Joseph's  “The Migrations that Shaped Indian Demography”. In this brief essay Joseph lays out the multiple migrations that have contributed to the formation of the population of the Indian sub-continent. This is accompanied by a video lecture on the same theme by historian Meera Visvanathan, where she delves deeply into the archeological, linguistic, textual and genetic evidence, particularly addressing the question who were the Aryans? To explore a much later migration, that of the Siddis, you will be reading a couple of short newspaper pieces about their history as well as their present.

KEY CONCEPTS:
Our overall engagement in both this and the next week will be held together and filtered through three key concepts, namely: (i) migration, (ii) diaspora, and (iii) deterritorialization.

Shah a'laan refugee camp Chris-Steele-Perkins-Magnum-Photos Long 1.jpg

101 India takes a look at the shrinking Chinese community in Calcutta

Jews in India are not a homogeneous community. Each regional Jewish community has a different migration myth, history, and ethnic identity. This documentary to looks at the Bene Israel Jews of Nashik, Maharashtra.

A brief snapshot of the life of Afghans in Calcutta. A 101 India production.

This is an exceptional documentary on the Siddis. In it, a Kenyan TV presenter comes to India looking for a lost tribe of 'Kenyans' in India

Prepartion
Migrants copy-1.jpg

Key concept #1
MIGRATION

Migration as an idea and a phenomenon appears to be fairly self-evident in its meaning. But when we look beneath the surface, we find that it is an extremely layered concept. In its most basic sense, it means the movement of people from one place to another with the intention of staying for a relatively long duration of time. This duration could be, on the one end of the spectrum, seasonal. On the other end, it could be a permanent move. Whatever the case may be in terms of duration of stay, migration necessarily entails translocation, i.e., locating one's social, cultural and economic life elsewhere, away from some prior idea of 'home', howsoever defined.

In the modern world, migration's frame of reference is the nation-state--a country-- and its territorial borders. In the pre-modern world, when political geography was not defined in terms of the nation-state, moving from one place to another, across different political formations was relatively much easier than what it is today, in the age of the nation-state. Hence, we have the distinction between internal migration, which is moving from one's home or place of residence to another place within a given country and overseas migration, which involves international border crossing and is stringently monitored by governments.

There is a further distinction to be drawn between voluntary migration and distress migration. The former is usually prompted by one's own free will, while  distress migration are translocations that are forced upon some individuals or groups of people by ecological/ economic/ political factors. But often, it is difficult to draw a very clear line separating voluntary and distress migrations. What appears voluntary may have underlying reasons that might force somebody to migrate.

Two types of forced/distress migrations standout in the context of the modern nation-state system. First is the movement of people from one country to another in order to escape persecution and/or other threats to life and livelihood in the country of their citizenship; we call these migrants refugees.  The second entails migration for similar reasons, but the movement takes place within the borders of a given nation-state. Such migrants today are referred to as internally displaced people or IDPs.

Concept 1
Chinese New Year Calcutta copy-2.jpg

Key concept#2
diaspora

Diaspora is a word of Greek origin, which literally means 'the scattering of seeds'. It was first used in the Jewish holy book, the Torah, and in the Christian old Testament with regard to the Jewish people who were forced out of Judaea, the biblical Jewish homeland, covering the present-day Israel and Palestine, beginning with the Babylonian conquest of Jerusalem in the 6th century BCE and subsequently with the Roman conquest of Palestine in the 1st century CE.

'Diaspora' appears in the English language much later, in the 19th century, to refer to the persecution and expulsion of Jews from different parts of Europe, culminating ultimately in the Holocaust.  In its modern usage, diaspora was initially associated with homelessness and victimhood, and was applied only to Jewish people. However, over the last fifty years or so, the word has gotten loosened from its original reference to the Jews and now is used to refer to any community living outside the lands of their ethnic and linguistic origin.

Increasingly, however, we find that diaspora, as a concept, acquiring a national frame of reference, just like migration. For example, people today tend to use Indian diaspora instead of Tamil or Bengali diaspora. It is still used sometimes in its original sense of forced displacement from homelands. But when used in this manner, it is often prefixed or qualified as victim diaspora or refugee diaspora. Otherwise, when it is used without any qualifiers, it simply means people who live outside the sites of their enthno-linguistic origins.

Concept 2
_DSC7267_edited.jpg

Key concept #3
deterritorialization

This third key concept is bit of a mouthful. But, notwithstanding the unwieldy nature of the word, it is a really useful concept to understand what happens to cultural practices, identity, sense of belonging, etc., when people migrate in large numbers and diasporic communities form, far away from their places of origin, their homelands.

'Deterritorialization' as a concept had a prior life in certain corners of European philosophy. But it emerged into prominence during the1990s in the social sciences, as a conceptual tool that helped make sense of the cultural processes and consequences of contemporary globalization. Globalization, argued those scholars who came up with the concept, with its unprecedented rise in the volume of goods, people, and money crossing international borders, was weakening the power of territorially-defined nation-states as the main gatekeepers of such movements and was reshaping national cultures. This, very simply put, is what the idea of 'deterritorialization' is meant to capture.

To further clarify this notion, let us take a concrete example: about 3.5 million Malayalis live in the Gulf countries today. That is a very large number of Malayali-speaking people, about 8% of its entire population, living away their native homes in Kerala, a state whose territory is otherwise identical with Malayali culture. The question, therefore, arises: what happens to Malayali culture, when people in large numbers move out of Kerala and settle in the Gulf countries? Well, Malayali culture does not remain bounded within the territory where Malayalam-speaking people have lived for hundreds of years anymore. It can be seen thriving, even acquiring new cultural expressions, in the lands that Malayali people have migrated to, far away from the territory of its origin. In other words, through mass migration of people from Kerala and the creation of a Malayali diaspora, and the interactions that diasporic Malayalis have with Kerala, Malayali culture gets de-territorial-ized.

Thus, to quote from the entry on the concept in Oxford References, deterritorialization "is the severance of social, political, or cultural practices from their native places and populations", i.e., the unlinking of culture and cultural practices from their native contexts and their remaking elsewhere through the processes of migration and diaspora formation.

_DSC7267_edited.jpg
Concpt 3

SOME TAKEAWAYS & QUESTIONS

We are keenly aware that Indian society is constitutively multi-ethnic and multicultural. But often slips our awareness is that this land is also home to communities and social groups that are originally from other parts of the world, from eastern Africa to western Asia.

While some of these groups have assimilated with the local cultures in a way that it is difficult to tell them apart, such as the Steppe Pastoralists, some others have voluntarily retained elements of their cultural practices and heritage to maintain a distinct identity.

Knowledge and recognition of communities who are now an integral part of India’s multicultural fabric but are originally from other parts of the world further drives home the point of India’s demographic and ethnic diversity.

We have seen in the videos this week dealing with migrant community experiences that many such communities are dwindling in numbers and/or feel marginalized in contemporary India.  What would you do to stem this tide, to integrate these communities better into India's body politics and society?  

bottom of page